VIP Class Notes (Jesse) [W]

Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is widely acknowledged that the protection of wild animals and birds is a necessity.Some people,however,point out that our goverments have contributed too much attention and too many resources to such protection on the ground that a lot of other industries cannot develop well without sufficient financial support.To tell the truth,l am strongly against laying too much emphasis on the protection of wild animals and birds.
From what l have mentioned above,it will make a detrimental impact on,above all,industries which are supposed to be more beneficial to human.Maybe you feel a little bit confused with my opinion.Therefore,l will try to illustrate it in the economics context as follows.As is known to all,every country’s financial income is limited.Giving too much attention and too many resources to the protection of wild animals and birds,in other words,means transferring some attention and resouces given to other industries to protection of wild animals and birds,which may lead to the consequence that those more profitable industries will experience recession,or even face the shortage of cash. Sequently, increasing unemployment rate,demand over supply, currency inflation and other dangers will follow behind.
It is,nevertheless,necessary that we take reasonable notice of the protection of wild animals and birds since endangered species are skyrocketing and natrual environment is worsening .As human beings,we are expected to shoulder responsibilities to lend helping hands to animals for the reason that the miserable divinities of animals nowadays is partly caused by our activities.
In conclusion,though giving too much attention and too many resources to the protection of wild animals and birds is undoubtedly wrong,we ought to be sympathetic to care for those animals in a more reasonable manner.

Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is widely acknowledged that the protection of wild animals and birds is a necessity.Some people,however,point out that our governments have contributed too much attention and too many resources to such protection on the grounds that a lot of other industries cannot develop well without sufficient financial support.To tell the truth,l am strongly against laying / putting too much emphasis on the protection of wild animals and birds.
From what l have mentioned above,it will have a detrimental impact on,above all,industries which are supposed to be more beneficial to humans / human beings. Maybe you feel a little bit confused by my opinion. Therefore, l will try to illustrate it in the economics context / in context of economics as follows. As is known to all,every country’s financial income is limited. Giving too much attention and too many resources to the protection of wild animals and birds, in other words, transferring some attention and resources given to other industries to protection of wild animals and birds, may lead to the consequence that those more profitable industries will experience recession, or even face the shortage of cash. Subsequently, increasing unemployment rates, demand over supply, currency inflation and other dangers will follow (closely behind).
It is, nevertheless, necessary that we take reasonable notice of the protection of wild animals and birds since endangered species are skyrocketing and natural environment is worsening. As human beings, we are expected to shoulder responsibilities to lend helping hands to animals for the reason that the miserable destiny of animals nowadays is partly caused by our activities.
In conclusion,though giving too much attention and too many resources to the protection of wild animals and birds is undoubtedly wrong,we ought to be sympathetic to care for those animals in a more reasonable manner.

Vocabulary

amateur < > professional
eg. I’m an amateur artist

I’m in my first year of university

take it away
eg. please take it away from him

accustomed to

average joe – just a normal guy

a mere mortal – a normal person that can die

it has an impact on sth

sb makes an impact on sth

walk to there with a few minutes – walk there in a few minutes 

everyone can be affordable – everyone can afford it 

i’m not in favor / i’m not into that idea

perseverance – per severe rence